It was fitting that on the last Friday of 2010 my last bike ride was my Bike Friday Tikit. I needed a pre-NYE haircut and who needs the hassle of driving?
What lock?
My trusty little buddy got me there and back with a smile. I enjoyed the warm sun and the quiet streets. 2010 was a great year. I’m glad my Bike Friday was a big part of it.
Each year when I go to Baja I trim my gear a bunch. I’m taking way less than last year, but…
Arrggghhh....full again!
…my truck is always full! How can that be? You’d think when you take 30% less stuff there should be 30% more free space, but it never works out that way…=-)
I currently have an Axiom rack top bag that I don’t love and it’s not waterproof so I’m open to something better.
More strap detail...
The problem with all multi-function bags is that they may not do any of their functions well. So my question is does anyone out there actually own one of these and if so can you tell me a bit about how it’s working for you?
“Visibility limitations make cycling at night particularly dangerous. We previously reported cyclists’ perceptions of their own visibility at night and identified clothing configurations that made them feel visible. In this study we sought to determine whether these self-perceptions reflect actual visibility when wearing these clothing configurations. In a closed-road driving environment, cyclists wore black clothing, a fluorescent vest, a reflective vest, or a reflective vest plus ankle and knee reflectors. Drivers recognised more cyclists wearing the reflective vest plus reflectors (90%) than the reflective vest alone (50%), fluorescent vest (15%) or black clothing (2%). Older drivers recognised the cyclists less often than younger drivers (51% vs 27%). The findings suggest that reflective ankle and knee markings are particularly valuable at night, while fluorescent clothing is not. Cyclists wearing fluorescent clothing may be at particular risk if they incorrectly believe themselves to be conspicuous to drivers at night.”
The US Military has developed weapons based on the concept that ultra bright lights can temporarily disable the target’s central nervous system incapacitating them. It appears that a number of bike light companies are using a similar approach to tail light technology.
I’m not suggesting you don’t use a rear light or that it should be feeble. What I am saying is buying the brightest light possible and shinning it into the eyes of drivers and cyclists approaching from the rear is not smart and is not going to increase your safety. It may even decrease your safety as you are impairing their vision and ability to operate their vehicle most profoundly as they are about to pass you – a time when you want people in cars to be at 100% performance.
How do you know if you are doing something wrong? Swap bikes with a friend and ride behind him at varying distances on a dark MUP or dark street. Note how you felt as you were exposed to the light from the back of your bike. Try the same thing, but this time in a car on a dark road and then a busier road with more lights. Again note how visible your bike was and how the lights you are using felt from that perspective.
How to be safe without burning out other folk’s retinas:
ride predictably…cars expect cyclists to be in certain places on the road and to behave in certain ways. That’s where a driver is looking for you. The more predictable you are the easier it is for you to be spotted and avoided.
ride intelligently…every route is different and has different pros and cons. Your most efficient safe commute in normal conditions may be dangerous when it’s foggy due to the many business lights/signs that could mask your bike’s lights. It might be better to take a longer slower route on side streets that day and accept the delay it will cause.
signal effectively…a black glove on a black jacket may not be an effective way to signal the fact you want to turn left. Be aware of what you are wearing and what you look like to other road users. When in doubt wait until the road is clear before turning or changing lanes.
use a rearview mirror…if getting hit from behind concerns you than keep an eye on what’s to the rear. If you see a car swerving like the operator is drunk just get off the road entirely until they are gone.
wear reflective material…it’s effective and cheap. Ankle bands and wrist bands are awesome for low cost visibility and turn signalling. A reflective vest is an easy way to amp up your visibility to cars without needing batteries or causing vision issues.
use two lower power lights vs. one ultra powerful light…LEDs have a small window of very bright light output. As you move sideways or up/down away from this zone the light power fades. Two light allows you to aim at different spots [20' away and 100' away or aimed slightly left and right] giving you more chance to be seen but not putting excessive light into any one area behind you. Two lights also mean a light failure or low battery doesn’t turn you into a totally black Road Ninja.
Set your lights to solid mode so they aren’t as dazzling.
Be considerate. If you do use a powerful rear light on rapid flash mode be ready and willing to change modes while riding if you see another cyclist or driver following you in a situation you know they’ve already spotted you.
Just like wearing a helmet doesn’t mean you’ll be safe on your bike – using the most powerful light you can get your hands on and assuming it will mean you are safe on the roads at night is a mistake. By all means use a bright tail light [and wear a helmet], but make it part of a bigger plan for night time safety not your only line of defense. And when you are holding that Dinotte tail light in your hands thinking how safe you’ll be when you turn it on and aim it into the eyes of over taking drivers consider for a moment that it’s a weapon and try approaching your bike from the rear on a dark street/MUP. If you can’t see anything, but a huge red spot for 20-30seconds afterwards maybe consider that your light may actually impair your safety or someone else’s as that dazzled driver passes you at 55mph.
Planet Bike Blinky 7...
PS – if you have any older LED tail lights like this Blinky 7 from Planet Bike consider putting them back into service. Instead of one uber bright LED that focuses all it’s light in one intense spot they use a bunch of bright, but lower power LEDs that push out light over a wider area. When you consider a wider viewing angler they may even be more visible than their brighter siblings. I’ll be using one of these on my rando rig along with a bunch of reflective material. It will be more than bright enough [on solid mode] to be seen on the rural roads/highways typical of Canadian brevet routes, but not as deadly on the eyes of randonneurs that may be following me for several hours.
Reflective gear has seen as many advances as modern bike lighting. It’s bright when a car or bike’s lights strike it. It’s cheap and it lasts for years with no batteries to charge or electric circuits to fail. For some reason cyclists treat reflective material as an accessory. It’s fine for the trim on our rain jackets or a nice to have on a messenger bag, but not something we think about with the same importance and focus as we do bike lights.
That’s a mistake.
As a driver I often spot a cyclist up the road because of their reflective material before I see their lights. Pumping ankle bands are distinctively a signal there is a cyclist ahead. My brain is trained to think cyclist, runner or road worker when I see reflective material. All of which demand some extra care as I approach them.
"X" marks the cyclist and arms signal my turns...
By all means fit your bike with effective lights, but also make sure you have made good use of reflective material as well. Ankle bands are small, cheap and useful if you are wearing street clothes. They really catch the eye of a driver. Reflective gloves make your turn signaling much more effective and they’ll fit over gloves in cool weather. A reflective vest or sash is easy to wear over anything and packs away into a small corner of your bag during the day.
You don’t have to wear all the stuff I have on in these photos, but wear a couple items to make yourself more visible without needing to add the weight, cost and complexity of more lights.
Having looked at 650B bikes recently the one question that I needed to resolve if I went with the less popular 650B size was what tires to use? If they stopped making 650B rims I could buy 8 and be set for 20yrs, but tires don’t last that long and don’t have the same shelf-life as a rim. Having said that the Greenspeed Scorchers have shown me that you really only need one awesome model of tire for a given wheel size to be happy. So I don’t care about having 15 choices. I just need a couple awesome ones.
Grand Bois Hertres 42mm 650 tire - Photog unknown...
The Pari-Motos are 127TPI & 280g with a true width of 38mm sold by Velo Orange for $59USD. They are very thin which makes them light and fast, but not very durable. Jan Heine at Bicycle Quarterly calls them an “event tire” because their thin casing [1.3mm compared to the 2.3mm of the Hetres] will wear out in ~2000kms on the rear. The Hetres are 412g and 42mm wide sold by Compass Bicycle [aka Bicycle Quarterly] for $68USD. The more robust Hetres hold 16% more air and should last over ~4000kms on the rear.
That sounds like two great options to me. Pari-Motos for brevets where speed/efficiency is key and Hetres for training and general use where long life and some extra plushness matter more.
Dual Dinotte 200L lights mounted on Sharon's bike...
A member of the Bike Forums.net rando sub-forum wanted photographic proof that symetric bike lights where more blinding than a vehicle’s head lights so I took these photos this morning.
Dual Dinotte 200L lights & Ford F150 on low beam...
Dinottes are far more blinding than two full size pick truck head lights. The truck is actually emitting far more light than the Dinottes, but this light is aimed down at the road so I can drive safely at 120kph on a pitch dark highway. Aimed this way the light doesn’t bother oncoming traffic.
Dual Dinotte 200L lights & Ford F150 lights on high beam...
Both sets of light are blinding and quite irritating. Note that the Dinottes hold their own against a full size pick up truck with its lights on high beam.
B&M Ixon IQ & Ford F150 on low beam...
B&M Ixon IQ and F150 on low beam – both sets of lights are clearly visible to oncoming traffic, but neither are blinding and both sets of lights put the majority of their output where it’s actually useful – on the road.
I haven’t thrown a leg over my Surly Pugsley since last winter. Totally sad, but moving and kiteboarding has really eaten up all my free time….=-( However, there is no other machine for the beaches and deserts of Baja that can tackle anything that comes along. So I’m happy to be checking over my fatty. Getting a few spares together and making sure she’s ready for another run south of two borders!
I can taste the warm tacos and cold beer already!
When I get to La Ventana I park my truck until it’s time to drive back. I’m strictly human power down there and I love the slower relaxed pace that comes with walking and biking for all my needs.
I don’t really have a LBS in Victoria where I feel as at home as Bow Cycle in Calgary. Maybe that’s going to take a lot longer. Maybe that won’t ever happen. However, I have to give the Fairfield Bicycle Shop some credit. I’ve been looking for some odd parts this year that I fully expected I would have to order online. In each case I figured I might as well try and buy local if I could, but really didn’t expect to be successful. And in each case Fairfield had exactly what I was looking for.
For example they had a Rohloff dual wheel chain tensioner. Exactly what I needed. $50 less than the best online price I had found and available right away so I could finish my bike build. You can’t really ask for more than that.
The focused B&M lights I ordered came in from Peter White Cycles yesterday. I don’t have my dynohub wheels setup for the B&M IQ Cyo lights, but I figured I’d test out Sharon’s Christmas present – a B&M Ixon IQ. Happily the packaging is re-sealable so I can put it back inside so she can open it up again herself. The first thing you notice is the Ixon IQ is larger than a typical bike light I’m used to. This is because the focused optic is a larger module and it holds 4 rechargeable NiMH batteries inside it. The case is made from high quality plastic and is quite light weight. It comes with a universal bar mount that’s designed to work with oversized and standard diameter bars. I tried it on two standard diameter bars and it works well. The mount can be left on your bike and the light housing slides off with a QR button for safe keeping at a stop. The Ixon IQ has one button which offers two modes:
high powered mode = 40 Lux [which I tested] for lighting up the road.
lower power city mode = 10 Lux for visibility not so much for lighting the road.
the button flashes green for high power and alternates red and green for city mode.
the faster the flashing the lower the power remaining in your batteries.
Sharon's bike setup for the light test...
Naturally being Christmas Eve I decided to run another light test. I put the Ixon IQ on Sharon’s bike with a Planet Bike Blaze 1W [she normally uses two of these for her commute] as well as my two Dinotte 200L’s….one of which has a DIY vertical cut off hacked on to it. Just looking at the lights the B&M is a lot bigger. The Dinottes are smallest with the nicest casing, but there is a battery pack req’d for each as well as a power cord between the light engine and battery pack…which taken in total isn’t as lovely or neat a setup. The buttons on all these lights are easy to use and the Dinotte and Ixon IQ both provide some useful feedback on the battery level via the lit up button.
Video note: the video seems quite dark when uploaded to Youtube. The Planet Bike Blaze has a spot beam visible to the eye and the Ixon and Dinottes are actually quite bright.
Prior to running this test I aimed all the lights as I would to use them while riding. Then I setup a camera on a tripod in my yard at about cyclist/pedestrian/motorist’s head height. I’m 5’11″ so I went slightly lower than my own head to capture the viewpoint of the majority of folks out there. I then used the following test format:
with the bike next to the camera I turned on all the lights [in this order: Planet Bike, Ixon, hacked Dinotte and unhacked Dinotte] to see what the beam looked like from the rider’s perspective.
then I moved to the far side of the yard and operated the lights in the same order with the bike pointed at the camera to see what the lights looked like from a road/MUP user’s perspective.
then I turned the bike around to test what the different modes offered by the PDW Radbot 1000 looked like to a person behind Sharon’s bike.
Planet Bike Blaze 1W
weakest of all lights tested
tightest beam pattern
not a good light to light up a dark road due to low light output and narrow beam
easily visible in solid and flashing mode
very bright if you are looking right into centre of beam
very dazzling in flash mode if you are looking directly into beam
Conclusion: effective visibility only light, but should be aimed down to avoid blinding others and preferably used in solid on mode to avoid irritating others. If all you need is a be seen light and take care with how you aim it than for $20 it’s a decent value.
B&M Ixon IQ
light output similar to Dinotte, but better utilized down on road
vertical cut off much more effective than my Dinotte hack
very easy to see bike when approaching from front, but spill light that enters eyes not enough to blind or irritate
no flash mode [illegal in Germany]
City mode is useful in town where lots of ambient light to see by so bike light mainly for safety to be visible to others
light pattern ideal for city speeds [15-27kph] I would like to test at higher
speeds
high quality feel to case, button, mount and optics
Conclusion: A well made high quality light, but performs poorly when compared to Ixon IQ. Given they cost the same amount I can’t recommend this light.
Video note: this video is also darker one Youtube than actual light beam was to eye.
This video shows what it’s like to ride with the Ixon IQ on a dark MUP as well as some sections with additional ambient light. My speeds where between 15-20kph mainly because riding faster with one hand in the dark isn’t a great idea! Note that the people I pass are visible, but not blinded. With my Dinottes they would look away as I passed or cover their eyes and their tone when greeted would be somewhat irritated [I've been yelled at because my Dinottes were so harsh on other cyclist's and ped's eyes].
Video note: the brightness of the Ixon IQ’s beam pattern in this video is more representative of what it looks like to the naked eye.
I shot one last video to highlight how effective the Ixon IQ’s beam pattern was at putting light exactly where you need it, but not blinding people. Also note that there is more than enough spill light to see the bike. Riding through town I found the Ixon IQ did an okay job of illuminating street signs, but for a brevet I might want a second light [perhaps helmet mounted] that I could use specifically for this purpose.
Accurate representation of how bright Ixon IQ is – Photo:
Peter White Cycles…
The photo above shows how bright the Ixon IQ is to the naked eye. My video camera loses a lot of the brightness and when uploaded to Youtube it gets dimmer again.
Overall Impression of the Ixon IQ
Awesome. This light exceeded all my expectations. The thought and careful design that’s gone into the beam pattern is impressive. You get exactly the light you need where you need it and nowhere else. One reason I didn’t buy this type of European light earlier was that I assumed it had to cost a fortune, but at $110USD it’s the same price as a Dinotte 200L and out performs the Dinotte handily. Until I get a dynohub sorted for my rando bike I’ll have to “steal” this light from Sharon for my longer brevets…=-) Two of these lights would be a great rando setup that could be swapped to a commuter bike during the week. If you need a high quality battery bike light for street/MUP use I can’t recommend anything better. A few final points:
Ixon IQ = 5hrs run time (3hrs more than a Dinotte 200L) at 40 Lux [high power]
Ixon IQ = 20hrs run time at 10 Lux [city mode]
Ixon IQ comes with bar mount…fork crown mount is available
service from Peter White Cycles was fast and pleasant as you would expect
BTW – my original test videos are brighter and easier to see than once uploaded to Youtube. If you’d like a copy of the original videos click here. Videos are being uploaded as I post this so if you can’t download them quite yet give it an hour and try again.
Don’t dry your shoes on a hot radiator. The rubber outsole will come unglued like it did to my 5.10 Impact Lows…user error!…=-( Shoe Goo aka Free Sole to the rescue. The fix is admittedly ugly, but the repair will hold long enough for me to wear out the rest of the shoe.
Update: Lane at CETMA is going to build me a PR rack for my Tikit. It will include a mount for the Brompton O-Bag QR bracket so I can just drop the O-Bag on the rack without having to strap it down or have it jump off on a bump. I’m going to drop off my Tikit on the way down to Baja and hopefully pick everything up on my way back home. Lane will have my Tikit as well as my O-Bag and Brompton QR bracket so he can fit everything up nicely. If you want the same setup drop him a line since he will have everything in hand as well as a bike to test fit things it will never be easier to order a Tikit PR rack.
I’m stoked. The only thing I was jealous about from the Brompton world was their front luggage. Now I’ll be able to have the great Tikit ride & fold with handy Brompton quick release front luggage and the utility of Alex’s PR rack. Sounds killer to me…=-)
Alex Wetmore is one of those smart guys that’s also handy enough to build the stuff he thinks of – a wicked combo for sure. I love his idea for a PR Rack on a Bike Friday Tikit. The more I ride my Tikit the more I think this makes a ton of sense rather than messing with panniers. I could strap on my bike messeger bag or a box or paper for the office with ease. I think I’m going to make one of these happen in 2011. Getting a custom rack built has some expense involved in design and getting jigs ready that could be used for many future racks. If you have any interest in one of these for your Tikit let me know. I could do the coordination with a rack builder and everyone who wants one pay him and have a rack built shipped from his shop. The result would be faster, easier and cheaper than 5 or 8 people getting custom racks for their Tikits.
I bought one of the first generation Apple MacBook Air ultra-thin laptops. I was admittedly seduced by the sleek metal case and amazingly thin profile. It’s hard to believe there is a full fledged computer inside that package. The cost given the performance of the internals is high, but as someone who uses a computer a ton I give a lot of points for ease of use and aesthetics. After two years the initial crush has worn off so I thought I would post my impressions of this product.
so light and thin you’ll take it with you everywhere
beautiful case [very solid only one small dent so far after a lot of use and travel]
solid full size keyboard [back lit]
trackpad is excellent
gorgeous bright screen
not powerful enough for my only computer, but fine for long trips or in a pinch if my desktop is down
battery life is just acceptable…I’m looking for a plug in often
Mac OSX strangles the volume so some movies are hard to hear without speakers or earphones
I haven’t wanted a USB optical drive….I just slave another Mac’s the odd time I need it
a bit more finicky on sketchy wireless networks than my Dell XPS
OSX is pleasant to use and all my Apple products mesh intuitively [don't need anti-virus software!]
bottom can get quite hot…if you block the vents the Air will overheat and CPU slow way down
it was expensive
Keep in mind Apple has come out with two newer generations of MacBook Air since mine so my comments may not fully apply to the newer beasts. Sharon liked mine so much she bought a 2nd generation Air and my friend Deanna just got a 3rd generation Air. Sharon uses it as her only computer and is fully satisfied with it. Deanna is doing a graduate program and wanted something portable to take to school. When I use Sharon’s I can tell it is noticeably faster than mine. I imagine Deanna’s kicks some serious butt and I hear they’ve improved the battery life.
Because I use a computer for so much of my critical work tasks I wouldn’t be happy with an Air as my sole computer. For that job I’ve got a 15″ MacBook Pro hooked up to a 32″ monitor. But, for most everything else the Air is plenty powerful. It’s also so easy to take along and use you’ll find you get a lot more opportunities to hit that power button than you would a bigger laptop. Even though we have bigger screens at our disposal Sharon and I will often watch a movie on the Air. The smaller screen is so bright and sharp it’s easy to forget that it’s kind of small. Plus the Air happily sits on your lap without cutting off circulation to your legs.
Would I buy another?
Absolutely. This is one of my favourite and most useful computers to use. The cost is high so it definitely falls into the luxury item category, but as long as I can afford it I’ll be buying myself a new one when this one breaks or just gets too old.
Recent Comments